“We call on the whole LGBTQ+ community – and organisations supporting the LGBTQ+ community – to join trans people in protesting this farce of an event”
BY NIC CROSARA, IMAGE BY ORIEL FRANKIE ASHCROFT VIA PEXELS
Yesterday (31 March) there was a leak of a Downing Street document seen by ITV News, which stated that the government has abandoned its pledge to ban so-called “conversion therapy”. These are practices which try to change, suppress or “cure” an LGBTQI person’s sexuality or gender identity. Boris Johnson’s predecessor Theresa May had promised to make it illegal and last year consultations began on how to move the ban forward.
After the documents were leaked, there was a collective outrage from the LGBTQI community and our allies. Within hours of the announcement, Paul Brand, the journalist who broke the original story, reported that the prime minister had backtracked. He will now move forward with the ban on “conversion therapy” and it will “absolutely” be in the Queen’s speech.
Paul Brand was told “the Prime Minister was shifted by the strength of the reaction from Conservative MPs and ministers when they saw the story break.”
“But he has removed trans conversion therapy from the equation and is insisting any bill must not have ‘unintended consequences’.”
Yesterday marked International Transgender Day Of Visibility, and this is a sombre reminder that visibility does not equal liberation. But as Lady Phyll pointed out yesterday, it does cause increased vulnerability.
🚨 U-TURN ON THE U-TURN 🚨— Paul Brand (@PaulBrandITV) March 31, 2022
The Prime Minister has changed his mind off the back of the reaction to our report and he WILL now ban conversion therapy after all.
Senior Govt source absolutely assures me it’ll be in Queen’s Speech.
But only gay conversion therapy, not trans.
Many activists and campaigners have addressed the harm of excluding trans people from the ban.
Govt does another u-turn. It will only ban gay conversion therapy but not its trans equivalent. A ban on conversion therapy that is not trans-inclusive is not a genuine ban. Excluding trans people from protection against harmful conversions is shameful https://t.co/lgLQdP5OW6— Peter Tatchell (@PeterTatchell) April 1, 2022
It’s ridiculous that @10DowningStreet isn’t protecting #transpeople from the horrors of #conversiontherapy given that they are twice as likely to be offered it and put through it.— Ozanne Foundation (@OzanneFoundn) March 31, 2022
Today is #TransDayOfVisibility for goodness sake! https://t.co/SDDEu7YwrP
TransActual has released a statement: “We are appalled but not surprised at the Government’s reported decision to row back from banning conversion practices for trans people. Just a few months ago, this same Government called conversion practices abhorrent. Its LGBT Survey of 2018 uncovered that trans people were twice as likely to be subjected to conversion practices, with Black trans people and trans people of colour vastly more impacted by them.”
“This decision to walk away from banning abhorrent practices leaves the most vulnerable in our society exposed to harmful actions disguised as therapies. It is notable that only those organisations opposed to trans inclusion have welcomed this decision.
“We note that the Government remains committed to it’s Safe To Be Me conference. This conference is spectacularly misnamed. While conversion practices for trans people remain legal, it is clearly not safe to be me if you are transgender or non-binary. We urge people to consider whether attending this conference is sensible when the Government is rowing back on what appear to have been hollow promises.
“We call on the whole LGBTQ+ community – and organisations supporting the LGBTQ+ community – to join trans people in protesting this farce of an event.”
DIVA magazine celebrates 28 years in print in 2022. If you like what we do, then get behind LGBTQI media and keep us going for another generation. Your support is invaluable.
✨ linktr.ee/divamagazine ✨